Science, and Sciences of Hadith

Sciences and Science of Hadith

It's interesting that in Science and Engineering, when you read scientific journals - they report and document everything : including failures or non-discoveries. The expectation is that other researchers/acedemicians will pick up their work and refine it further, building upon established findings, advancements in knowledge (at time of new discovery).

Some branches of knowledge eventually reach maturity and yield conclusive results, and have a general consensus of its correctness, but there are many areas that continue remain as 'unknowns' or characterized by inaccurate 'correlations' until today, despite hundreds of years of research.

The beauty of this is one can draw parallels with the development of the Sciences of Hadith (narrations related to the statements and actions of the Prophet Muhammad (sallAllahu alayhi wasallam),

This explains why some books of past scholars will include Inauthentic, Weak (Dha'eef) and Fabricated (Maudhu) hadith - including books we have today such as Tafsir ibn Kathir, Sunan Abu Dawud, Musnad Ahmad, etc.

Just like scientific journals won't be understood by common laymen outside of the field, likewise the same for some books of the hadith.

Some books are written by scholars, for other scholars - retaining them in hopes that other future scholars will then research on individual narrations to 'filter' out which ones are authentic and which ones are not, in a process called "tahqeeq" (Verification).

It is not because they want people to act upon inauthentic ahadith, but more updated knowledge in the future (e.g. more detailed biography of narrators, other chains of narration with similar content to strengthen) might shed further insight to the potential authentic nature in the future.

While we have a wealth of knowledge on what is definitely authentic (Sahih), and what is definitely fabricated/false, those which hadith scholars generally agree upon, there are still also a huge number of narrations which have yet to be fully checked, in the same way that many scientific discoveries have yet to discover the answers.

It is a job of a Hadith Scholar to refine this 'raw information' and filter it out to be beneficial for use by the common layman; in the same way that a Scientist would interpret all the raw data and discovery to be eventually utilized into something that can be produced for practical use and benefit to society or industries.

So as laymen we should be careful about sharing hadith narrations and not just "copy paste" unless we are sure they are authentic (e.g. scholars generally agree that all hadith by Al-Bukhari and Muslim are authentic), or we ensure that an established Hadith scholar authority has verified it to be authentic (e.g. Al-Albani, ibn Hajr, At-Tirmidzi)

Its interesting to note that while the practice of Scientific journals predates back to the 17th century in England and France, the Sciences of Hadith and its publications of narrations and biographies predates back all the way to the 8th century, since the time of the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad. The oldest published narrations that are still in existence today are those written from Hammam ibn Munabbih (written in the 8th century).

The foundations of science established 9 centuries before the first scientific journal.. Allahu Akbar.

May Allah make us amongst those who benefit from this wealth of established knowledge of the hadith of the Prophet, and may He make us amongst those steadfast in living our lives in accordance to how He is Pleased with. Amin.

قُلْ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُحِبُّونَ اللَّـهَ فَاتَّبِعُونِي يُحْبِبْكُمُ اللَّـهُ وَيَغْفِرْ لَكُمْ ذُنُوبَكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّـهُ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ 






Say (O Muhammad, to mankind): "If you (really) love Allah then follow me, Allah will love you and forgive you of your sins. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah Al-Imran 3:31)